Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Conspicuously Absent (Score 4, Interesting) 46

A million years ago I got their print catalogs, which were like 60 pages made up of the last two pages of old comic books. The emphasis was on "surplus." They had fresnel lenses for big screen TVs, strong magnets, unbranded auto solenoids, and factory-second microscopes and inflatable rafts. I suspect their impending demise can be traced to more efficient markets for random crap and more efficient manufacturing processes and supply chains. But if they manage to sell four of these Panzer tank sights, they'll be in the black again.

Comment Re:Harvard can enroll students (Score 4, Insightful) 255

It's like the old saying: "You can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride;" Harvard's pool of applicants is now smaller and of somewhat lower quality than it would have been, because of the additional uncertainty. And the term "additional uncertainty" now includes a risk of being deported to Sudan for writing an OpEd in the school paper, so you can imagine how this shapes the applicant pool for less prestigious schools.

Also, FWIW, an adjudicated rapist, obvious con-man, and florid dementia patient got a plurality of the popular vote, so how good can the American education system pretend to be?

Comment Re: Trade imbalances are not necesarily bad (Score 2) 262

Claiming that factories exclusively run on robots is a scare tactic to keep jobs from coming back.

Not exclusively robots, but enough. The first chart in this American Enterprise Institute page tells the tale: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.aei.org%2Fcarpe-diem... You can't strawman away 45 years of increasing manufacturing output accompanied by declining manufacturing employment, nor can you Great Pumpkin the jobs back to 1980 levels.

Comment Re: This is a good time to remind everyone (Score 1) 238

Babies don't have enough self awareness to feel that another (very different) mode of living invalidates their own natural (but essentially arbitrary) preferences.

To the extent your sense of worth is derived from being the kind of person who likes the things you like, encountering people who are happy or successful without conforming to those preferences is invalidating.

Comment Re: I don't think it's AI (Score 2) 168

Saying you would change something invites questions like"what?" and "how?" If you're an lying ignoramus with credulous followers, you can answer those questions however you like.

But if you want to be honest, you're in a bind.

However, what makes the U.S. experience so unique was that inflation was comparable across developed economies while growth in GDP, consumption, and employment was exceptional relative to competitors.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.brookings.edu%2Farti...

What would Harris have done differently to get better results? It was a fair, but loaded, question. I think the answer would have been too complicated for the average voter, and being an honest answer from a black woman, would not have persuaded many people of the land who voted for Trump.

Comment Speculative damages (Score 0) 64

I think I remember an earlier round where he was unable to prove damages: how do you prove lost opportunities if payoffs from Soros and big solar aren't actually happening? (It isn't like Exxon was going to pay him a million dollars to tell them what they already know.) Here's an article from 13 years ago describing the familiar playbook: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2012%2F03%2F28...

Comment Re:Facts convinced them? (Score 1) 134

I think conspiracy theorists are invested in their own ability to discern "the truth" where normal people only see "the narrative"--so they aren't invested in any particular facts apart from their conclusion (RAND Corporation with flying saucers and reverse vampires FTW). The researchers think that the facts can sell themselves better when you take the emotions of pride and insecurity out of the equation.If your position on any major issue was acquired by a chiropractor's video on youtube, you are terrible at evaluating credibility and using an AI is probably better than getting someone who knows what they're talking about.

Slashdot Top Deals

Between infinite and short there is a big difference. -- G.H. Gonnet

Working...