Also, FWIW, an adjudicated rapist, obvious con-man, and florid dementia patient got a plurality of the popular vote, so how good can the American education system pretend to be?
Claiming that factories exclusively run on robots is a scare tactic to keep jobs from coming back.
Not exclusively robots, but enough. The first chart in this American Enterprise Institute page tells the tale: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.aei.org%2Fcarpe-diem... You can't strawman away 45 years of increasing manufacturing output accompanied by declining manufacturing employment, nor can you Great Pumpkin the jobs back to 1980 levels.
Babies don't have enough self awareness to feel that another (very different) mode of living invalidates their own natural (but essentially arbitrary) preferences.
To the extent your sense of worth is derived from being the kind of person who likes the things you like, encountering people who are happy or successful without conforming to those preferences is invalidating.
But if you want to be honest, you're in a bind.
However, what makes the U.S. experience so unique was that inflation was comparable across developed economies while growth in GDP, consumption, and employment was exceptional relative to competitors.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.brookings.edu%2Farti...
What would Harris have done differently to get better results? It was a fair, but loaded, question. I think the answer would have been too complicated for the average voter, and being an honest answer from a black woman, would not have persuaded many people of the land who voted for Trump.
I think I remember an earlier round where he was unable to prove damages: how do you prove lost opportunities if payoffs from Soros and big solar aren't actually happening? (It isn't like Exxon was going to pay him a million dollars to tell them what they already know.) Here's an article from 13 years ago describing the familiar playbook: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2012%2F03%2F28...
I think conspiracy theorists are invested in their own ability to discern "the truth" where normal people only see "the narrative"--so they aren't invested in any particular facts apart from their conclusion (RAND Corporation with flying saucers and reverse vampires FTW). The researchers think that the facts can sell themselves better when you take the emotions of pride and insecurity out of the equation.If your position on any major issue was acquired by a chiropractor's video on youtube, you are terrible at evaluating credibility and using an AI is probably better than getting someone who knows what they're talking about.
Between infinite and short there is a big difference. -- G.H. Gonnet